The Smart Platform for Maturity Assessments

The SOC Capability Maturity Model provides a structured approach to evaluating and improving Security Operations Center capabilities. This industry-standard framework has been adopted by organizations worldwide as the foundation for SOC maturity assessments.

Built on proven capability maturity principles, this model offers a systematic way to benchmark current SOC performance and create actionable improvement roadmaps across all critical operational areas.

SOC Maturity Framework 360 (SOC360) is a multi-dimensional Maturity Assessment for Security Operations Centers that fuses governance, people, process, technology, services, and a dedicated Risk Integration domain. It scores each capability across Maturity, Coverage, and Capability, mapping to every important aspect of a modern Security Operations Cyber / Cyber Defense Center.

An ESRS-aligned CSRD maturity model delivering a 60-question, three-level assessment across Governance & Strategy, Double Materiality, ESRS Data Management & Reporting, and Value-Chain Due Diligence. It separates “must-do” regulatory obligations from strategic “should-do” improvements, benchmarks readiness, surfaces control gaps, and prioritizes remediation—supporting audit-ready evidence, reliable disclosures, and board-level oversight within modular enterprise ESG programs.

OWASP ASVS Maturity Model provides a unified, control-centric assessment mapping ASVS 5’s 17 chapters to Domains→Aspects→Questions. The model quantifies control effectiveness, pinpoints level-blocking gaps, and produces a risk-prioritized remediation roadmap—supporting CI/CD guardrails, defensible assurance to auditors, and measurable improvements release over release.

This GDPR maturity model translates the Regulation’s 99 articles into a Domains→Aspects framework with three capability tiers: Foundational, Managed, Optimized. It benchmarks policies, processes, and controls across the data lifecycle, evidences accountability (Art. 24/30/32/35), and embeds privacy by design/default—providing DPOs and CISOs a defensible roadmap, measurable KPIs, and audit-ready artifacts for continuous improvement.

Built on NIST CSF 2.0, this maturity model structures cybersecurity across Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover, decomposed to Categories and Subcategories. It measures Current vs Target Profiles using a three-level scale (Foundational, Managed, Optimized), yielding prioritized roadmaps, quantifiable risk metrics, and audit-ready evidence. The pyramid distribution ensures strong baseline controls while guiding strategic, progressive capability uplift.

Anchored in ISO/IEC 27001, this ISMS Maturity Model spans clauses 4–10 and Annex A across three stages—Foundational, Managed, Optimized/Proactive. It offers a practical certification roadmap, benchmarks operational effectiveness beyond checklist compliance, and supplies defensible metrics for management review. Teams use it to prioritize risk treatment, evidence GDPR TOMs, and sustain improvement between surveillance audits and customer due-diligence.

Gradum’s NIST SP 800-171/CMMC model maps the 14 control families to Domains, binds all 110 requirements to Aspects/Questions, and stages capability across Foundational, Managed, and Optimized levels targeting CMMC Level 2. It streamlines gap triage, remediation, and evidence capture, strengthening DFARS-aligned audit defensibility, supplier comparability, and executive risk visibility while operationalizing policy-to-control traceability and measurable maturity deltas.

Built on CIS Controls v8, this model translates IG1–IG3 into measurable safeguards, role ownership, and evidence expectations. It delivers risk-based scoring, threat-informed prioritization, and prescriptive remediation roadmaps mapped to NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001, and SOC 2. Outcome: faster MTTR, clearer audit trails, board-ready metrics, and continuous improvement across asset, configuration, vulnerability, logging, and response.

Built on DOE’s C2M2, this model maps MIL1–MIL3 across OT/IT domains, translating practices into measurable controls, evidence criteria, and role ownership for Gradum.io assessments. It baselines posture, quantifies risk reduction, and produces defensible remediation roadmaps. Native mappings to NERC CIP/NIST CSF accelerate audit readiness, strengthen supplier oversight, and drive resilient, regulator-trusted cyber operations.

This NIS2 Maturity Model converts EU legal obligations into an actionable, measurable roadmap across eight domains and nineteen aspects. Using a three-level scale—Foundational, Managed, Optimized—it assesses 125 capabilities spanning governance, Article 21 technical controls, incident reporting, and supply-chain risk. Outputs prioritize remediation, evidence demonstrable compliance, inform board reporting, and drive continuous, benchmarked resilience.

Built on the Unified Core ESG Model and aligned to EU CSDDD articles, this maturity model benchmarks due-diligence capability across governance, impact identification, prevention/mitigation, stakeholder engagement, and monitoring/disclosure. A diamond-weighted level design surfaces foundational gaps, prioritizes risk-based actions, and sequences an executable roadmap with control objectives and evidence, enabling in-scope enterprises to demonstrate continuous improvement across their value chains.

This DORA Maturity Model converts regulatory obligations into an L1–L2–L3 capability roadmap across ICT risk, third-party risk, incident/crisis management, resilience testing, and information-sharing. It drives programs beyond checklists to measurable operational resilience—aligning KRIs, RTO/RPOs, and SLAs with business impact; prioritizing remediation; evidencing supervisory readiness; surfacing critical supplier dependencies; and preparing organizations for TLPT with board-level oversight.

Gradum.io’s ESG General Maturity Model consolidates leading frameworks (GRI, SASB, ISSB) into a unified, pillar-based assessment. It delivers materiality-aligned diagnostics, pillar and overall scores, and anonymized peer benchmarks, with optional sector modules. Output is an auditable, prioritized roadmap and KPI linkages, enabling sustainability, finance, risk, and operations to target investments and demonstrate control effectiveness.

As the European Union introduces the world’s first comprehensive AI law, organizations face a stark choice: treat compliance as a cumbersome cost center or embrace it as a foundation for digital trust. The sheer density of the EU AI Act—spanning risk management, data governance, human oversight, and post-market monitoring—can paralyze even the most agile teams.

The Gradum.io EU AI Act Maturity Model was built to break that paralysis. It is not merely a legal checklist; it is a sophisticated operational diagnostic tool. By decomposing the regulation into actionable controls across distinct domains—including Governance, Technical Robustness, and Supply Chain obligations—Gradum.io offers a 360-degree view of your organization's AI posture.

Why use a maturity model? Because binary "Pass/Fail" metrics fail to capture the complexity of AI systems. Our 5-level scale allows you to pinpoint exactly where you stand: are your data practices just "Repeatable," or are they "Managed" and audit-ready? Are you effectively screening for prohibited practices, or are you exposed to maximum liability?

Organizations using the Gradum.io Maturity Model gain immediate visibility into their legal exposure. They transition from reactive panic to proactive governance, securing their license to operate in the EU market while protecting their brand reputation. In an era where trust is the ultimate currency, Gradum.io provides the ledger.

Cybersecurity reporting suffers from a fatal translation error: Security teams speak in "vulnerabilities" and "patches," while Boards speak in "revenue" and "risk." This communication gap creates a dangerous illusion of safety—the "Watermelon Effect"—where status reports look Green on the outside, but the operational reality is Red on the inside.

The Gradum.io Cyber Security Health Check Model is a sophisticated diagnostic framework designed to bridge this gap. Unlike static compliance frameworks (like ISO or NIST) that ask if a control exists, our model asks how effective it is in the face of modern threats. It evaluates organizational maturity across 10 strategic domains, probing deep into the nuance of Identity Fabric, Cloud Infrastructure, DevSecOps, and the Human Perimeter.

Why use this model? Because modern threats like Supply Chain compromises, AI-driven attacks, and Ransomware bypass traditional perimeter defenses. This model forces organizations to confront uncomfortable truths: Is your "Air Gap" actually gapped? Is your "MFA" phishing-resistant? Do you have a "Cyber Insurance" policy that will actually pay out? By grading maturity on a rigorous 0-5 scale, it provides a prioritized roadmap for improvement. It empowers security leaders to move beyond "fire-fighting" and start building Cyber Resilience—aligning security investment directly with business value protection.